Figures released yesterday by Ofcom, the UK media regulator, indicate that the incredible growth of the DVB-T based Freeview platform shows no sign of slowing. Since the platform was launched in October 2002, over 27 million DVB-T receivers have been sold. The bulk of these, 17.5 million, are set-top boxes, but the number of IDTVs (TVs with an integrated DVB-T tuner) is growing. In the last quarter of 2007, for example, 2.3 million IDTVs were sold, as against 1.8 million set-top boxes.
In a market where 87% of homes now receive digital television, the terrestrial platform is the most popular with 37% of all homes watching DTT. Digital satellite commands 36% of the market (of which 4% watch free-to-air services), and digital cable has a 14% share.
Digital TV has been a real success in the UK and many other countries (e.g. New Zealand, Indonesia, etc...) are now looking to mirror that success by making a similar range of services available under similar circumstances.
Friday, 28 March 2008
Monday, 17 March 2008
Slow take-up for DTT in Brazil
As predicted here and elsewhere, it looks like expensive receivers are ensuring that the launch of DTT services in Brazil are to blame for a very slow take-up of the new services. A report on Advanced-Television.com last week that only 10,000 households have made the switch to digital since the launch of services in Sao Paulo at the beginning of December. At this rate the analogue switch-off target date of 2016 looks amibitious.
Meanwhile, DVB-T receivers continue to fly off the shelves in Spain, France, the UK and elsewhere... Cheap receivers are a necessary pre-requisite for quick take-up of newly launched DTT services - ISDB-T (the Japanese system adopted by the Brazilians) is not synonymous with cheap set-top boxes. An average DVB-T zapper box is now selling for less than USD $40 in many markets across the world.
Meanwhile, DVB-T receivers continue to fly off the shelves in Spain, France, the UK and elsewhere... Cheap receivers are a necessary pre-requisite for quick take-up of newly launched DTT services - ISDB-T (the Japanese system adopted by the Brazilians) is not synonymous with cheap set-top boxes. An average DVB-T zapper box is now selling for less than USD $40 in many markets across the world.
Wednesday, 23 January 2008
UK retailers boost for DVB-T sales
A report on the BBC website indicates that electrical retailers Currys, Dixons and PC World are to stop selling analogue TV sets and will stock only models with built-in digital receivers from now on. Such products are known as IDTVs, or Integrated Digital TVs. Already, they say, more than 90% of the sets they sell are "digital". This is sure to provide a boost to Freeview with purchasers of a new TV set having immediate access to more than 40 channels, with no further payment due (other than the TV license!).
Friday, 4 January 2008
Prices tumble in Oz
Word reaches us from Australia that discount supermarket chain ALDI is selling HD DVB-T receivers for less than AUS $100 (or about EUR 60) and SD receivers for AUS $35 (about EUR 21). MPEG-2 video coding is used for both SD and HD services in Australia, where 7MHz channel bandwidths are used.
The attached photo shows that the HD box outputs 576p, 576i, 720p and 1080i video, with a range of connections including HDMI and DVI.
Friday, 21 December 2007
Brazil - Price Update
The Brazilians launched their DTT services earlier this month based on the Japanese ISDB-T system, with a few local variations (and using MPEG-4 video). Indications are that it will be some time yet before receivers reach a price that will be affordable for the masses.
For a Standard Definition box, i.e., one with MPEG-4 decoding but outputting only 480i the price seems to be around 500 BRL, which is about $280 USD.
For a High Definition box, with 720p and 1080i video output (over HDMI) the price leaps to $44o USD.
For a Standard Definition box, i.e., one with MPEG-4 decoding but outputting only 480i the price seems to be around 500 BRL, which is about $280 USD.
For a High Definition box, with 720p and 1080i video output (over HDMI) the price leaps to $44o USD.
Monday, 17 December 2007
Why Taiwan is important for Chile?
Despite the fact that an announcement was expected last Friday on which DTT system the Chileans would choose, it seems that decision has been postponed (again) and the political maneuvering is set to continue.
Proponents of the Japanese system (as chosen by Brazil) are said to have been claiming that DVB isn't used anywhere else that uses 6MHz channel bandwidths and the NTSC system for analogue TV. This has sparked a flurry of activity amongst DVB supporters pointing to the example of Taiwan. The DVB website reports (with a Spanish translation, leaving no doubt as to who the story is aimed at) that Taiwan now has more than 2 million DVB-T receivers, the majority of which are set-top boxes.
Proponents of the Japanese system (as chosen by Brazil) are said to have been claiming that DVB isn't used anywhere else that uses 6MHz channel bandwidths and the NTSC system for analogue TV. This has sparked a flurry of activity amongst DVB supporters pointing to the example of Taiwan. The DVB website reports (with a Spanish translation, leaving no doubt as to who the story is aimed at) that Taiwan now has more than 2 million DVB-T receivers, the majority of which are set-top boxes.
Tuesday, 11 December 2007
Limiting access to new technologies...
Starting from January, US consumers who rely on over-the-air signals for the TV service will be able to apply for up to two US$ 40 coupons that can be used to off-set the cost of digital-to-analogue converter boxes (or set-top boxes, as they're known elsewhere). These will allow consumers to continue using their old TV sets after analogue switch-off, which is due to happen in February 2009.
I've been reading through some of the information about the coupon program on the NTIA website, and I can't helping finding the whole philosophy behind the scheme to be somewhat twisted. There's a section of the site aimed at manufacturers who want to produce boxes that can be certified as qualifying under the coupon program, including a set of criteria (PDF) that can disqualify a box from being eligible. The general message seems to be that the coupons can only be used against the most basic of boxes - in other words, if you can't afford to equip yourself for the digital TV revolution, you're not entitled to have the latest technology. Features that disqualify a set-top box from the coupon program include not just high value-added things like a DVD drive, a hard disc or even a VCR, but also such basic features as VGA output, DVI output, YPbPr component video output, or HDMI. (One wonders what was the thinking behind putting in place these criteria?)
Contrast this to the equivalent programs in Italy and Austria where the respective governments, when DTT services were launched, used the subsidies to ensure that consumers could benefit from a more highly specified box, specifically a box with MHP middleware along with smartcard slots (and, as far as I'm aware, no limit on what outputs the box offered). If consumers wanted to go out and buy a simple "zapper" box, with only the very basic specs, they pay for it themselves...
I wonder whether this is related to the differing DTT standards used in the USA and these two European countries. DVB-T has been so successful worldwide that basic receivers are so cheap as to not require a subsidy. (e.g. more than 8 million receivers sold in France since launch in 2005). In the USA, where ATSC holds sway, the majority of receivers sold can be accounted for by the mandate that requires all new TVs to have an integrated tuner (which many or most people don't even use) - there isn't really a market for converter boxes, or set-top boxes. (I've been unable to come by any real information about what the price point will be for these boxes yet.)
The moral of the story: if you have a big population of analogue TV sets and you want your citizens to have the best technology at the cheapest price, you're probably better off with DVB-T.
I've been reading through some of the information about the coupon program on the NTIA website, and I can't helping finding the whole philosophy behind the scheme to be somewhat twisted. There's a section of the site aimed at manufacturers who want to produce boxes that can be certified as qualifying under the coupon program, including a set of criteria (PDF) that can disqualify a box from being eligible. The general message seems to be that the coupons can only be used against the most basic of boxes - in other words, if you can't afford to equip yourself for the digital TV revolution, you're not entitled to have the latest technology. Features that disqualify a set-top box from the coupon program include not just high value-added things like a DVD drive, a hard disc or even a VCR, but also such basic features as VGA output, DVI output, YPbPr component video output, or HDMI. (One wonders what was the thinking behind putting in place these criteria?)
Contrast this to the equivalent programs in Italy and Austria where the respective governments, when DTT services were launched, used the subsidies to ensure that consumers could benefit from a more highly specified box, specifically a box with MHP middleware along with smartcard slots (and, as far as I'm aware, no limit on what outputs the box offered). If consumers wanted to go out and buy a simple "zapper" box, with only the very basic specs, they pay for it themselves...
I wonder whether this is related to the differing DTT standards used in the USA and these two European countries. DVB-T has been so successful worldwide that basic receivers are so cheap as to not require a subsidy. (e.g. more than 8 million receivers sold in France since launch in 2005). In the USA, where ATSC holds sway, the majority of receivers sold can be accounted for by the mandate that requires all new TVs to have an integrated tuner (which many or most people don't even use) - there isn't really a market for converter boxes, or set-top boxes. (I've been unable to come by any real information about what the price point will be for these boxes yet.)
The moral of the story: if you have a big population of analogue TV sets and you want your citizens to have the best technology at the cheapest price, you're probably better off with DVB-T.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)